GPGI Shareholders Face September Deadline in Securities Fraud Lawsuit

The complaint centers on claims that GPGI—formerly known as CompoSecure—artificially inflated the value of Husky Technologies Limited during the acquisition process. Attorneys allege that the division failed to meet its stated financial benchmarks and that the deal served primarily to enrich company insiders. These discrepancies reportedly surfaced after the class period, causing significant losses for shareholders when the market adjusted to the disclosed reality.

Brian Schall and David Schwartz are leading the outreach for the Los Angeles-based firm. While the class has not yet been formally certified, shareholders who suffered losses are eligible to contact the firm to discuss potential recovery options or their role as a lead plaintiff. Participation does not require out-of-pocket payments, and those who choose not to act remain absent class members until a court decides otherwise.